← All news
High-profile case

“Brothers in Arms” Demanded That Likud Remove a Video Clip and Apologize

The “Brothers in Arms” organization sent a warning letter to the Likud party’s legal adviser ahead of possible legal proceedings. The organization is demanding that posts by the prime minister and the party be removed within 12 hours and that they apologize.

Key facts

  • •Publication date: 13.10.2026
  • •Deadline for removal and apology: 12 hours
  • •Recipient: attorney Ilan Bombach, Likud’s legal adviser
  • •Sender of the letter: attorney Amit Mor
  • •The source did not mention a lawsuit or court ruling

What Sparked the Dispute

The claim concerns a video clip in which it was said: “People from ‘Brothers in Arms’ come and say: We intend to disrupt the elections.” It is unclear from the materials presented where and when the clip was published, or precisely which parts of it the organization considers unlawful.

To Whom the Warning Was Sent

The letter was sent to Likud’s legal adviser, attorney Ilan Bombach. It was sent by attorney Amit Mor on behalf of the organization. The recipients were given 12 hours to remove the posts and apologize.

No Judicial Determination Yet

This is a warning ahead of legal proceedings, not a lawsuit that has been filed or a court ruling. The source does not mention a case number, court name, potential compensation amount, or specific statutory provisions on which the demands are based. The article also does not include a response from Likud or the prime minister.

What this means for you

A warning ahead of legal proceedings gives the recipient an opportunity to remove the disputed material or respond to the claim before the matter is taken to court, but it does not in itself establish that the law has been violated. For ordinary users and organizations, this situation shows that posts containing claims about the intentions of a particular group may lead to a legal dispute, although in this case no court has examined the legality of the video clip.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings

Latest legal news