Seven-Year Prison Term for Crash That Killed an Engaged Couple
The Beersheba District Court sentenced Suria Abu Arar, 44, to seven years in prison after convicting her of two counts of reckless homicide in the deaths of Eliav Abaksis, 23, and his fiancée, Shahaf Danino, 28. She was also disqualified from driving for 20 years and ordered to compensate each victim’s family.
Key facts
- •Court: Beersheba District Court
- •Crash: February 2025
- •Offence: Two counts of reckless homicide
- •Sentence: Seven years’ imprisonment
- •Driving disqualification: 20 years
- •Compensation: ₪180,000 to each family
The fatal collision
The couple were killed in a head-on collision near Beersheba in February 2025. According to the judgment as reported by Ynet, Abu Arar crossed a solid dividing line to overtake two vehicles and accelerated to 124 km/h on a road with a 90 km/h limit. She moved into the opposing lane, swerved and struck the couple’s Mazda; both were pronounced dead at the scene.
Conviction and sentence
Abu Arar admitted the charges and was convicted of two counts of reckless homicide following a mediation process. District Court Judge Noa Haklai imposed seven years’ imprisonment, a 20-year driving disqualification and compensation of ₪180,000 to each victim’s family. The prosecution had requested up to 16 years in prison and a driving disqualification of up to 25 years.
Why the court imposed the sentence
The judge found that Abu Arar did not want the victims to die, but deliberately chose to carry out the dangerous overtaking maneuver and took an unreasonable risk. The court said that having her minor children in the vehicle did not reduce her responsibility because her conduct also endangered them. In mitigation, the judge considered Abu Arar’s admission and the effect that imprisonment would have on her eight children.
Families may seek an appeal
The victims’ families reacted with anger and disappointment to the seven-year term. Their representative from the Legal Aid Administration said they would seriously consider appealing what they regarded as an unduly lenient sentence. The source does not state that an appeal has been filed or decided.
What this means for you
The ruling shows that an intentional decision to overtake dangerously can support a reckless-homicide conviction even when the driver did not intend to kill anyone. Sentencing may reflect both the severity of the driving and personal mitigating circumstances, while imprisonment, lengthy licence disqualification and compensation can be imposed together. The supplied source does not identify a case number or name the governing statute.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Общая практика
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион