Court ruling9/6/2026

Parties Permitted to Contact Voters Who Have Not Yet Arrived at the Polls

The Central Elections Committee overturned Justice Noam Sohlberg's decision, which restricted the real-time transfer to parties of information about whether certain voters had voted. The parties will now be able to send messages to voters who have not yet arrived at the polls.

Key facts

•The decision was made by the Central Elections Committee
•Publication date: September 6, 2026
•The previous decision was issued by Justice Noam Sohlberg
•The Likud party had previously requested reconsideration of the prohibition
•The case number is not specified in the source
•No monetary sums or statute names were specified

What Happened

The Central Elections Committee's decision became known on September 6, 2026. The committee reconsidered the prohibition imposed by Justice Noam Sohlberg, under which party representatives at polling stations were barred from transmitting real-time information about the identities of those who had voted.

The Previous Decision

About two weeks earlier, Justice Sohlberg rejected the Likud party's request to reconsider the prohibition he had imposed. According to the source, the refusal was based on the need to protect citizens' privacy and ensure the integrity of the elections.

What the Committee Decided

The Central Elections Committee overturned Sohlberg's decision. As a result, the parties will be able to use voting data to send messages to voters who have not yet arrived at the polls. The source does not specify the precise legal reasoning for the new decision, the conditions governing the transfer of the data, or any possible restrictions.

What this means for you

A voter who has not yet arrived at the polling station may receive a targeted message from a party based on up-to-date voting data. However, the source report does not make it possible to determine exactly which personal details may be transferred, who will have access to them, or what confidentiality safeguards will apply.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings