Hebrew University Deliberated on Doctoral Student’s Complaint for Nearly Three Years
Johanna Steinmeyer, a mathematics doctoral student at the Hebrew University, complained of sexual violence and emotional manipulation by her academic adviser, Professor Karim Adiprasito. The internal proceeding lasted nearly three years, and the complainant died between the issuance of the decision and the appeal.
Key facts
- •Institution: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- •Body: The university’s internal disciplinary tribunal
- •Duration of the proceeding: Nearly three years
- •Sanction: Payment to the family equal to two salaries
- •Publication date: October 4, 2026
- •The case number and the normative act applied are not specified
Nature of the Complaint
Steinmeyer claimed that she was completely dependent on her academic adviser and that he subjected her to sexual violence. Among the acts she described were forcing her to sleep in the same bed with him dozens of times, as well as emotional manipulation. It is not clear from the material presented exactly which allegations the internal tribunal found proven.
Lengthy Proceeding
The case was heard by the Hebrew University’s internal disciplinary tribunal. The proceeding lasted nearly three years; the doctoral student’s friends claim that its duration was affected by delays caused by the professor and his lawyers. In January, Steinmeyer’s body was found in her apartment, and at the time of publication, the circumstances of her death had not yet been officially determined.
The Decision and Penalty
According to the report, an appeal process was scheduled following the decision, but Steinmeyer died before it was heard. The academic adviser was required to pay the complainant’s family a sum equal to two of his salaries. The full text of the decision, the legal classification of the acts, the appeal’s final outcome, and the normative basis for the sanction are not provided in the source.
Criticism of the University
Steinmeyer’s friends believe that the measure imposed was disproportionate, especially given the length of the proceeding. The report also states that the professor obtained a position at a prestigious institution. Unnamed senior university officials called the penalty ridiculous and acknowledged that people who were aware of what was happening did not stop him in time.
What this means for you
The case shows that an internal disciplinary proceeding at an institution of higher education can last for years and does not necessarily end with a measure that the complainant or those close to her consider proportionate. For students and researchers in positions of dependency, transparency regarding timelines, a clear appeal process, and institutional mechanisms capable of responding promptly to reports of abuse are especially important.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Уголовное право
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион