High Court of Justice Prohibits Parties From Receiving Information From Polling Stations About Who Has Voted
The High Court of Justice overturned the decision of the Central Elections Committee plenum and prohibited party representatives at polling stations from reporting in real time to party headquarters who had already voted. The Court held that this is personal information and that its transfer infringes the right to privacy.
Key facts
- •Body: High Court of Justice
- •Case number: Not specified in the source
- •Date of judgment: Not specified in the source
- •The decision of the Central Elections Committee plenum was overturned
- •Data concerning participation in voting was recognized as personal information
- •No sums or name of a specific statute were specified
What the Court Ruled
The chair of the Central Elections Committee, Justice Noam Sohlberg, initially prohibited party representatives from providing party headquarters with information about the identities of those who had come to vote. The Committee plenum disagreed and allowed the previous practice to continue, but the High Court of Justice overturned that decision. The case number, date of judgment, and parties to the proceeding are not specified in the source.
The Legal Basis
The Court held that information about whether a person exercised the right to vote is personal information. The law does not expressly authorize party representatives to use such data to mobilize voters, and the Central Elections Committee has no authority to permit its transfer to political parties. Another rationale was the protection of the right to privacy.
How This Will Affect the Parties
In the past, the religious parties received detailed information from polling stations and contacted supporters who had not yet voted. It is now prohibited to use information obtained from the polling room for this purpose. United Torah Judaism is considering voluntary telephone reports from voters, activity by campaign workers outside polling stations, and assigning several dozen supporters to each campaign worker.
What Restrictions Remain in Force
Voters are not required to give campaign workers their names or confirm that they participated in the vote. The telephone system also does not make it possible to verify whether the caller actually voted. The source reports only that these options are under consideration, not that they have received final approval.
What this means for you
A political party is not supposed to receive information from its representative inside a polling station about whether a particular person has voted. Voters themselves may voluntarily report this to party headquarters or a campaign worker, but the source does not indicate that there is any obligation to disclose this information.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Общая практика
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион