High Court Sets Rules for Minister’s Bid to Remove Competition Chief
A five-justice High Court of Justice panel unanimously ruled that Economy Minister Nir Barkat’s request to remove Competition Commissioner Michal Cohen must go before the Civil Service appointments committee. The committee may conduct a shortened preliminary review, but election-period restrictions currently prevent it from convening, so Cohen remains in office for now.
Key facts
- •Court: High Court of Justice, five-justice panel
- •Decision date: 9 September 2026
- •Result: unanimous on the procedural outcome
- •Minister: Nir Barkat
- •Official concerned: Competition Commissioner Michal Cohen
- •Case number: not stated in the source
The dispute
Cohen was appointed Competition Commissioner in 2022 by then-economy minister Orna Barbivai. Five months after Barkat became economy minister in early 2023, he asked Cohen to resign and later sought her removal, alleging a serious and continuing breakdown of trust and criticizing her performance in restraining monopolies and food companies. The previous Civil Service Commissioner declined to convene the appointments committee, relying on the Attorney General’s position that a preliminary examination was required.
What the court decided
The court rejected the Attorney General’s request for a further hearing and upheld the earlier conclusion that the Civil Service Commissioner cannot alone block a minister’s removal request. Instead, the appointments committee must consider the request. If it discloses no even prima facie ground, or contains another clear administrative defect, the committee may use a shortened preliminary procedure—without oral arguments—to reject it at the threshold.
Safeguards for independent officials
Four of the five justices clarified that a claimed loss of trust in a senior officeholder must be objective. Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit said it must rest on a detailed, solid and objective evidentiary basis showing that the loss of trust arose from professional considerations. The majority emphasized the need to protect senior enforcement and regulatory officials, including the Competition Commissioner, from political dependence and from removal proceedings that could create a chilling effect.
Why Cohen remains in office
Although Barkat’s request is to be placed before the appointments committee, the court clarified that any move to end Cohen’s tenure is currently subject to the rules applying during an election period. Because the committee cannot convene during that period, the removal process cannot presently advance. The source therefore reports that Cohen remains Competition Commissioner for now.
What this means for you
A minister cannot personally secure the dismissal of a senior regulator merely by asserting a personal crisis of confidence, and the Civil Service Commissioner cannot alone prevent the request from reaching the committee. The committee can quickly screen out a baseless or clearly defective request, while any substantive claim of lost trust must be supported by objective professional evidence. Election-period restrictions may also delay such proceedings even after the court has clarified the proper process.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Общая практика
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион