High Court of Justice Permits Amit Aisman to Lead the Investigation Into the Military Advocate General Affair
The High Court of Justice rejected the request for a rehearing in a case related to Israel’s Military Advocate General. The decision leaves intact the previous ruling, according to which State Attorney Amit Aisman may lead the investigation.
Key facts
- •Court: High Court of Justice
- •Report date: September 8, 2026
- •Publication time: 19:32
- •State Attorney: Amit Aisman
- •Justice: Daphne Barak-Erez
- •The case number is not provided in the source
What the Court Decided
The court declined to hold a rehearing and left intact the framework for the investigation that had been established previously. Accordingly, Amit Aisman may continue to lead it. The source does not state who filed the request for a rehearing.
The Justice’s Position
Justice Daphne Barak-Erez expressed hope that, at this stage, it would be possible to advance the completion of the handling of the case as required by law. The report does not detail the full legal reasoning for the decision or the provisions of law that were applied.
What Is Known About the Affair
The source refers to the proceeding as the “Military Advocate General Affair,” but does not disclose the circumstances of the investigation, the identities of those involved, or any possible suspicions. The court case number is also not provided.
What this means for you
The decision confirms that the mere filing of the request for a rehearing did not change the identity of the official previously designated to lead the investigation. For people in a similar procedural situation, this shows that after the High Court of Justice rejects the request, the original decision remains in effect unless the court orders otherwise.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Общая практика
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион