← All news
High-profile case

High Court of Justice to Urgently Hear Yair Golan’s Demand for Shin Bet Protection

Yair Golan, chairman of the Democrats party, petitioned the High Court of Justice after the Shin Bet did not provide him with protection, even though the police raised his threat level to 4 out of 6. An urgent hearing was scheduled for October 6, 2026, but the source does not indicate a final ruling in the case.

Key facts

  • •Petitioner: Yair Golan, chairman of the Democrats party
  • •Respondent to the substance of the demand: Shin Bet Director David Zini
  • •Court: High Court of Justice, Supreme Court of Israel
  • •Hearing: October 6, 2026
  • •Threat level according to the police assessment: 4 out of 6
  • •The case number is not stated in the source

Why Golan Filed the Petition

Golan demanded that the Shin Bet’s VIP Protection Unit provide him with protection. The demand was based on a notice from the police unit that handles threatened individuals, according to which Golan’s risk level was raised to 4 out of 6. The petition was filed about a week before the hearing.

The State Authorities’ Position

The State Attorney’s Office stated that on September 16, 2026, the Ministerial Committee on Shin Bet Affairs adopted a top-secret decision regarding the protection of party leaders. After assessing the intelligence and available resources, the Shin Bet determined how to implement the decision, taking into account the specific threat to each party leader. The service said that it is implementing this framework for party leaders participating in the elections and intends to contact Golan in the near future.

What the Court Will Need to Examine

Justice Ofer Grosskopf demanded an immediate response from the State Attorney’s Office, after which an urgent hearing was scheduled. Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit and Justices Ofer Grosskopf and Ruth Ronen will hear the case. In the source author’s assessment, part of the hearing may take place behind closed doors and ex parte because of classified information held by the security agencies.

No Ruling Has Yet Been Issued on the Merits

The High Court of Justice has not yet ruled on whether the Shin Bet is required to provide Golan with personal protection. The source also does not state the case number or identify a specific statutory provision on which the demand is based. Accordingly, at this stage, the matter concerns future judicial review of the security service’s decision, rather than a final outcome of the dispute.

What this means for you

The case may clarify how the court reviews decisions concerning the protection of political figures when a substantial portion of the material is classified. For people in a similar situation, it illustrates that a police threat assessment does not necessarily, by itself, result in the automatic provision of Shin Bet protection. The final legal implications will become clear only after the High Court of Justice issues its ruling.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings

Latest legal news