Rights10/13/2026

Katz Ordered Journalist’s Administrative Detention Before His Release

Defense Minister Israel Katz signed a six-month administrative detention order against Palestinian journalist Rasem Obeidat of East Jerusalem. This occurred after the court refused to extend his criminal detention due to insufficient evidence and intended to release the journalist.

Key facts

•Detainee: Rasem Obeidat
•The decision was signed by Defense Minister Israel Katz
•Administrative detention period: six months
•Court: Jerusalem District Court
•Publication date: October 13, 2026
•The case number and applicable statute are not specified

Why the Journalist Was Arrested

The police sought to extend Rasem Obeidat’s detention on suspicion of membership in a terrorist organization. Obeidat is described as a senior Palestinian journalist from East Jerusalem. The article does not provide a case number or a detailed description of the evidence presented by the police.

What the Court Decided

The court refused to extend Obeidat’s criminal detention and intended to release him due to insufficient evidence. The photo caption stated that the hearing took place at the Jerusalem District Court. The exact wording of the court’s decision and the possible conditions of release are not provided in the source.

The Defense Minister’s Decision

Before the release, Israel Katz signed an administrative detention order allowing Obeidat to remain in detention for an additional six months. Thus, his continued detention was authorized not as an extension of the criminal detention, but as an administrative measure. The source does not specify a particular statute or provision under which the order was issued.

How the Two Proceedings Differ

The criminal detention in the situation described was connected to the investigation of a specific suspicion and required judicial extension. The administrative order allowed the detention to continue after the court refused to extend the criminal detention. The article did not report whether Obeidat appealed the order or whether a separate judicial review of the administrative detention was conducted.

What this means for you

This story shows that a court’s refusal to extend criminal detention does not always lead to immediate release: the state may invoke a separate mechanism of administrative detention. For a person in a similar situation, it is important to distinguish between the grounds and procedures for criminal detention and administrative detention, because they are regulated and reviewed in different ways.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings