← All news
High-profile case

Zvi Sukkot Destroyed a Memorial in the Village of Madama: IDF Denies Coordinating It

Knesset member Zvi Sukkot was filmed attempting to destroy a memorial in the Palestinian village of Madama, south of Nablus. Sukkot claimed that he acted in full coordination with the IDF, but the military said that it had coordinated only his visit, not the destruction of the memorial.

Key facts

  • Person involved: Knesset member Zvi Sukkot
  • Location: the village of Madama, south of Nablus
  • Publication date: August 25, 2026
  • Legal proceeding: not specified in the source
  • Law or charge: not specified

What Happened

On the morning of August 25, 2026, Sukkot, who represents the Religious Zionism party, arrived in the village of Madama under IDF protection. A video shows him and members of his team attempting to smash a memorial erected at the site. The village is near the settlement of Yitzhar, where the Knesset member lives.

The Knesset Member's Position

Sukkot confirmed to Haaretz that he participated in the destruction. He said the memorial was dedicated to terrorists who murdered dozens of Israelis and therefore should not have been left standing. According to the source, the memorial bore a quotation from the Quran and a list of village residents who had been killed, some of whom had carried out attacks.

What the Authorities Said

The Knesset member insisted that his actions were fully coordinated with the IDF. According to the account provided, the military responded that only Sukkot's visit had been coordinated, not the destruction of the memorial. The prime minister condemned taking the law into one's own hands.

Legal Status Not Specified

The source does not report an arrest, investigation, filing of an indictment, or legal proceeding. Nor were a case number, court name, ruling, or applicable statutory provisions provided. Therefore, based on the published information, it is not possible to determine whether the Knesset member's actions will have legal consequences.

What this means for you

The presence of military security during a public officeholder's visit does not in itself indicate that the IDF authorized every action taken there. However, the source does not report that legal proceedings have been initiated, so at this stage no conclusion can be drawn regarding Sukkot's legal liability.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings

Latest legal news