Legislation9/21/2026

Nvidia CEO Called for No Separate Regulation of Artificial Intelligence

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang stated that instead of creating a special regulatory regime for artificial intelligence, enforcement of existing laws should first be ensured. This is the position of the company’s chief executive, not a decision by a court or legislature.

Key facts

•Publication date: September 21, 2026
•Speaker: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
•No new law or judicial decision was adopted
•The specific existing laws were not identified
•The interview was given to the CBS television network

What Huang Said

In an interview with the CBS television network, Huang called for artificial intelligence to be developed as quickly as possible, without launching products that are not ready or not safe. In his view, a rapid pace of innovation is consistent with ensuring safety.

The Dispute Over New Rules

Huang opposed creating a separate regulatory system for artificial intelligence, similar to the U.S. authorities that oversee drugs, food and aviation. He believes that existing laws should be applied first. The report did not specify precisely which statutory provisions should be used.

The Response to Warnings About the Threat

Nvidia’s CEO also rejected predictions that artificial intelligence could bring about humanity’s extinction within the next decade. His position runs counter to warnings from representatives of Anthropic, including the company’s CEO, Dario Amodei, who call for greater caution and a slowdown in development.

Data Centers and Local Residents

Huang also acknowledged that technology companies should have discussed the construction of data centers with local communities in the United States earlier. According to him, artificial intelligence infrastructure expanded so rapidly that the industry did not have time to establish the necessary dialogue with residents.

What this means for you

Huang’s remarks do not, in themselves, change the rights and obligations of citizens or companies in Israel. They reflect the position of one of the industry’s major players in the international debate over whether special rules for artificial intelligence are needed or whether enforcement of existing legislation is sufficient.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings