Recording Filed in Maccabi Tel Aviv Basketball Shareholder Dispute
A recording of controlling owner Udi Recanati was filed in the Tel Aviv District Court as part of a request to appoint an arbitrator in a dispute among Maccabi Tel Aviv Basketball Club shareholders. The source reports no ruling on that request.
Key facts
- •Proceeding: request to appoint an arbitrator
- •Court: Tel Aviv District Court
- •Club control: Udi and Shai Recanati, 58%
- •Chairman Shimon Mizrahi’s reported holding: 14.5%
- •Reported annual club cost: $31.8 million
- •Case number and ruling date: not stated
The ownership dispute
Udi Recanati and his son Shai hold a combined 58% controlling interest in the club, according to the report. The recording and transcript document a recent conversation between Recanati and an organizer of a fan protest against the Recanati family’s business and management decisions. They were submitted to the court during the week in proceedings seeking the appointment of an arbitrator.
Claims about the Federman era
Recanati discussed the end of a 26-year partnership with the Federman family and criticized former club chief executive Dani Federman’s management. He alleged that management decisions had been made “under the table” and “behind the back,” while saying he had been very close to Dani’s late father, David Federman. The Federman family responded that its name and that of David Federman were being harmed and said it should not be drawn into the current ownership events.
Budget and prospective investors
Recanati said the club’s cost for the year was $31.8 million and claimed the Federman family had opposed increasing its budget. He also described sponsor Eyal Waldman—identified in the source as Rapyd founder Arik Shtilman, who sought to acquire a club stake—as too aggressive and unsuitable as a sponsor. Recanati spoke favorably about Jason Levien, a former Memphis Grizzlies chief executive whom he wants to bring into the club, emphasizing Levien’s connection to Israel.
What the court has—and has not—done
The reported procedural step is the filing of the recording and transcript in the Tel Aviv District Court in support of a request to appoint an arbitrator. The source gives no case number, filing date, statutory basis or judicial decision. It therefore does not establish that the court accepted the allegations in the recording or ordered arbitration.
What this means for you
For people involved in an Israeli shareholder dispute, private communications may be submitted as evidence in court proceedings concerning how the dispute should be resolved. Filing a recording does not by itself prove its claims or indicate that the court has ruled in favor of either side. The source does not report any immediate change to the club’s ownership or management.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Уголовное право
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион