← All news
Labour

The National Road Safety Authority Demanded That Wolt Appoint Regional Safety Officers

Israel’s National Road Safety Authority demanded that Wolt appoint regional traffic safety officers for its courier service. The Authority believes that such an obligation may arise under the Traffic Regulations, even if the couriers are not company employees, but this position has not yet been tested in court.

Key facts

  • •Legal basis: Regulation 579 of the Traffic Regulations
  • •Threshold for the relevant category: 40 vehicles
  • •Demand: regional traffic safety officers
  • •Wolt’s proposal: two safety officers at the national level
  • •Meeting requirement: three meetings within ten days
  • •Source’s latest update: October 23, 2026

Nature of the Dispute

Wolt initially argued that one safety officer at the national level could meet its needs, and later proposed appointing two. The Authority rejected this option and demanded regional safety officers, whose details the company must provide for ongoing supervision. If Wolt does not agree to this voluntarily, the Authority intends to apply to the court for a ruling.

Basis for the Demand

The Authority relies on Regulation 579 of the Traffic Regulations, which defines the term “enterprise” to which vehicle operation safety requirements apply. According to the Authority’s position, Wolt may be regarded as the operator of the vehicles used by the couriers, even though the company does not employ them directly. In the category that includes motorcycles, operating at least 40 vehicles may require the employment of a traffic safety officer; the scope of the position is determined separately, taking into account the number and types of vehicles.

Why the Couriers’ Status Is Not Decisive

Wolt regards the couriers as independent service providers who choose their own working hours and workload. The Authority proposes examining the company’s responsibility not through employment relations, but through its possible status as a vehicle operator. This interpretation has not yet received judicial approval, and therefore the material described contains no final legal determination.

Additional Demands by the Authority

The Authority also demanded the submission of data on safety and road accidents involving couriers, and that three working meetings be held within ten days. It claims that Wolt is delaying cooperation and failing to provide the requested information. The company, for its part, says that it works continuously to improve road safety and criticizes the Authority’s actions.

What this means for you

If the court accepts the Authority’s position, platforms may bear obligations in the field of traffic safety even without the couriers being recognized as their employees. For couriers and other road users, this could result in regional supervision, additional safety procedures, and the collection of accident data. At this stage, this is an Authority demand and a threat to apply to the court, not a judgment that has taken effect.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings

Latest legal news