High-profile case10/14/2026

Ronen Bar Filed a NIS 3 Million Defamation Lawsuit Against Netanyahu

Former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar filed a lawsuit against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Tel Aviv District Court. The lawsuit concerns publications in which Netanyahu attributed “crimes” to Bar in connection with his actions before the October 7 attack and claimed that Bar knew of the tangible danger on the night of the attack.

Key facts

•Parties: Ronen Bar v. Benjamin Netanyahu
•Court: Tel Aviv District Court
•Relief sought: NIS 3 million
•Subject of the lawsuit: Defamation
•The case number is not specified in the source
•The filing date was stated as Wednesday, without a calendar date

The Former Shin Bet Chief’s Demands

Bar is seeking NIS 3 million in damages for defamation. He claims that Netanyahu’s statements contain false information that harms both his reputation and the reputation of the Shin Bet. The lawsuit was filed through attorneys Reuven Behar, Yoram Bonen and Doron Kol of the FBC law firm.

The Warnings Before October 7

The lawsuit presents a chronology of meetings, assessments and documents conveyed to Netanyahu from November 2022 through early October 2023. Bar claims that he warned of the weakening of Israeli deterrence, the strengthening of Hamas and the threat of a multi-front conflict, and that on March 22, 2023, he reported a threefold increase in the number of warnings of terrorist attacks. According to Bar, he proposed restricting the entry of workers from Gaza, attacking the organizers of terrorism and preparing for escalation, but many of his recommendations were not followed up with practical action.

What Happened on the Night of the Attack

Bar rejects the claim that the Shin Bet concealed information about the tangible threat from the prime minister. According to the lawsuit, at 03:03 a warning about signs of offensive activity in the border area was circulated among the security agencies, and instructions were given to convey the information to the prime minister’s military secretary, Avi Gil. Bar also claims that he first spoke with the IDF chief of staff at 06:29, after the rocket fire had already begun.

No Judicial Ruling Has Yet Been Issued

This is Bar’s position in the statement of claim, not facts established by the court. He intends to seek discovery of documents concerning the warnings and discussions that preceded the attack; however, his attorneys anticipate that Netanyahu may claim immunity and the need to take state security interests into account. The source presented did not report Netanyahu’s response to the lawsuit or any judicial decision.

What this means for you

The mere filing of the lawsuit does not indicate that the defamation claims have already been proven: the court must still examine the parties’ positions and the admissible evidence. The case also illustrates that a dispute over public statements may raise questions of immunity, discovery of state documents and the protection of information concerning Israel’s security.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings