High-profile case9/26/2026

The Sara Netanyahu Case: Conviction, Investigations, and Labor Disputes

Sara Netanyahu does not hold public office, but reports link her to personnel decisions and the prime minister’s schedule. Her representatives reject many of the allegations, but one criminal proceeding ended in a guilty plea, and labor courts awarded compensation from the state to employees of the residence.

Key facts

•Conviction in the food affair: June 2019
•Value of the meals under the agreement: 175,000 shekels
•Payment to the state and fine: 45,000 and 10,000 shekels
•Meni Naftali: 170,000 shekels from the state
•Guy Eliyahu: 120,000 shekels from the state
•Publication of the dossier: September 26, 2026

The Criminal Proceeding Concerning Food Orders

In June 2018, Sara Netanyahu was indicted in connection with orders of prepared meals for the prime minister’s residence totaling 359,000 shekels between 2010 and 2013. In June 2019, as part of a plea agreement, she was convicted under an amended indictment of “intentional exploitation of another person’s mistake without fraud”: the value of the meals received was set at 175,000 shekels. She transferred 45,000 shekels to the state and paid a fine of 10,000 shekels.

Investigations and Proceedings That Were Closed

In March 2000, the police recommended indicting the Netanyahus in the Avner Amadi moving-services affair and the gifts affair, but in September of that year the case was closed for lack of evidence. In 2016, the police recommended filing indictments against Sara Netanyahu in several incidents related to the residences; the cases concerning the garden furniture, the electrician, and the caregiver were closed in 2017 due to an insufficient evidentiary basis. Following the broadcast of an investigation by the program “Uvda” in December 2024, an investigation was opened on suspicion of pressuring witness Hadas Klein and obstructing legal proceedings, but in April 2026 the police recommended closing the case without questioning Sara Netanyahu.

Disputes With Residence Employees

In February 2016, the Jerusalem Labor Court awarded former residence manager Meni Naftali 170,000 shekels from the state and ruled that abusive employment conditions related to Sara Netanyahu’s conduct had prevailed at the residence. In May 2016, employee Guy Eliyahu was awarded 120,000 shekels from the state, including 65,000 for humiliating employment conditions. By contrast, cleaner Shira Raban’s lawsuit for 225,000 shekels was dismissed in 2022 as not credible, and Sylvie Gensia’s lawsuit was struck out in 2025 on procedural grounds. Most employees filed lawsuits against the state or their employers, rather than against Sara Netanyahu personally, and no compensation was collected from her in these cases.

Influence Without an Official Position

Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan said that he refused to continue a classified briefing in Sara Netanyahu’s presence because she did not have the required security clearance. Nir Hefetz claimed that key appointments in the Prime Minister’s Office did not go forward without her approval; the Netanyahu family and the Likud party denied this. In 2025, her attorney explained in court that she was entitled to receive the prime minister’s schedule and decide which events to attend. This information does not indicate that she has formal governmental powers.

What this means for you

The article shows that public allegations, a police recommendation, the filing of an indictment, and a court conviction are distinct legal stages with different implications. An employee at a government residence may sue the official employer for compensation even when the allegations relate to another person’s conduct; however, the outcome depends on the evidence and compliance with procedural rules. The informal influence of a public official’s spouse does not in itself create formal powers.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings