Court ruling8/13/2026

Supreme Court: Classified Materials Link Hospital Director to Hamas

The Supreme Court heard an appeal concerning the detention of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, director of Kamal Adwan Hospital in the Gaza Strip. Justice Gila Canfy-Steinitz concluded that the classified intelligence materials presented to the court corroborate the claim that he was involved with Hamas and in terrorist activity.

Key facts

•Court: Supreme Court of Israel
•Justice: Gila Canfy-Steinitz
•Publication: August 13, 2026
•Case number: Not stated in the source
•Sums and statute applied: Not stated

What the Court Considered

The proceeding concerned Abu Safiya's detention. Attorney Nasser Ouda represented him. The hearing took place about two months before the article was published, but the exact date and case number are not stated in the source.

The Conclusion Regarding the Classified Materials

The court reviewed classified intelligence that may not be published. In the court's assessment, the information supports the claim that Abu Safiya is a Hamas operative and that he was actively engaged in terrorist activity. The source does not disclose the content of the information itself.

The Dispute Regarding Solitary Confinement

The attorney argued that Abu Safiya's transfer to solitary confinement was punishment for filing an appeal against his continued detention. The justice rejected this account and ruled that the transfer resulted from a reason that cannot be disclosed.

Why the Decision Was Published

The decision, issued about two months earlier, was cleared for publication at the request of the newspaper Haaretz. The source does not provide the precise wording of the final ruling concerning the period of detention and does not identify the statute that was applied.

What this means for you

The decision shows that, when reviewing detention, the court may rely on classified intelligence materials and refrain from disclosing the reasons for certain measures if those reasons are protected by confidentiality. At the same time, the court examines the defense's arguments, including claims of punishment for petitioning the court, but in this case that claim was rejected.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings