Criminal9/3/2026

Suspect in the Abduction of 10-Year-Old Yahli to Remain in Custody

The Petah Tikva Magistrate's Court extended until September 8 at 2:00 p.m. the detention of a Jerusalem resident suspected of abducting 10-year-old Yahli. The court ruled that the suspicion remained well-founded and that the nature of the acts attributed to him indicated that the suspect posed a danger.

Key facts

•Court: Petah Tikva Magistrate's Court
•Judge: Erez Melamed
•The detention was extended until September 8 at 2:00 p.m.
•The arrest was made on August 30
•The ban on publishing the name remains in effect until September 6 at 12:00 p.m.
•The case number is not specified in the source

The Disappearance and Arrest

Yahli disappeared from Petah Tikva on Sunday evening, after which searches for him were conducted for about five hours. At around 1:30 a.m., the child was found in Bnei Brak alongside the suspect. The Jerusalem resident was arrested on August 30 on suspicion of abduction and child stealing; the investigation is examining what happened during those hours and whether there were additional victims.

Why the Detention Was Extended

At the second hearing, the police requested that the suspect remain in custody for an additional eight days. Judge Erez Melamed noted that a review of the case materials indicated a high degree of suspicion and that the nature of the acts attributed to the suspect established grounds for detention based on dangerousness. Accordingly, the detention was extended until September 8 at 2:00 p.m.

The Defense's Position and the Suspect's Condition

Attorney Frida Wall of the Public Defender's Office argued that the footage held by the police showed no use of force: according to her account, the child voluntarily followed the suspect with the scooter. The defense also drew attention to the suspect's mental condition and the absence of a preliminary psychiatric opinion, despite an earlier court decision. The court ordered that the district psychiatrist's position be obtained.

The Dispute Over Publication of the Name

The police sought permission to publish the name in order to locate other possible cases and encourage witnesses to contact investigators. The court granted the request, noting that no serious and exceptional harm had been proven beyond the ordinary harm accompanying disclosure of a suspect's name in criminal proceedings. However, at the defense's request, implementation of the decision was stayed until September 6 at 12:00 p.m., and therefore the name remains under a publication ban until that time.

The Child's Interview Was Not Completed

It was not possible to complete Yahli's special interview, which was conducted on Tuesday. According to the information presented to the court, the child had difficulty remembering what had happened and at a certain point asked to stop. The source does not report that an indictment was filed or that a final determination was made regarding the suspect's guilt.

What this means for you

Extending detention during the investigative stage does not mean that the person has been found guilty: the court examines the strength of the suspicion and whether grounds exist for continued detention. The decision also shows that a suspect's name may be disclosed to advance the investigation, but the court may temporarily delay publication to allow consideration of the defense's position.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings