High-profile case8/20/2026

Suspects in the Murder of Benayahu Razi Accused Each Other During Confrontation

During a police confrontation, Agam Tsarfati and Linor Sasson presented conflicting accounts of the events that occurred after Benayahu Razi’s death in an apartment in Jerusalem’s Nahlaot neighborhood. Each denied responsibility and placed it on the other.

Key facts

•The incident: the death of Benayahu Razi in Jerusalem’s Nahlaot neighborhood
•Main suspects: Agam Tsarfati and Linor Sasson
•Number of participants examined: seven
•Publication date: August 20, 2026
•Case number and court: not specified in the source

What Happened During the Confrontation

The investigator sought to determine what the participants said and did after they allegedly realized that one of those present in the apartment had died. Tsarfati claimed that Sasson instructed Avior to change his black shirt because identical black clothing looked suspicious, and that the young people were allegedly told to leave Jerusalem. Sasson denied this and claimed that she had come only to bring some belongings.

Mutual Accusations

Sasson also rejected the claim that she had asked for Benayahu to be brought to the apartment and called on Avior to punish him. During the confrontation, she accused Tsarfati of using the other participants to carry out the murder. Tsarfati, for her part, continued to claim that Sasson was the one who instructed them to change clothes.

How the Police Gathered Evidence

Chief Inspector David Tamstat, who led the investigation, said that the actions of seven people were examined as part of the case. According to him, there was no single decisive piece of evidence: investigators cross-referenced findings from the apartment, recordings, and information about the detainees in the vehicle. The police separately investigated what each participant did and knew, what each was equipped with, and what role each played in the violence.

Status of the Case

According to the source, Tsarfati and Sasson are defined as the main suspects, but the statements cited remain the accounts of the participants in the investigation. The source does not state the case number, the name of the court, the charges filed, the statutory provisions applied, or the final judicial ruling.

What this means for you

A confrontation helps the police examine inconsistencies between statements, but does not in itself determine guilt. It is important for a person in a similar situation to understand that accusations made by one suspect against another must be examined alongside physical evidence, recordings, and additional investigative materials. The source presented contains no information about a judicial determination regarding the guilt of any of the participants.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings