High-profile case9/3/2026

How the High Court of Justice Returned the “Progressive List for Peace” to the 1984 Elections

In 1984, the Central Elections Committee disqualified the Jewish-Arab “Progressive List for Peace” from participating in the elections. The High Court of Justice overturned the disqualification and allowed the list to run, but the political partnership later dissolved.

Key facts

•Elections: 1984
•Body: Central Elections Committee
•Court: High Court of Justice
•Ruling: The list was allowed to participate in the elections
•The case number and date of the ruling were not specified
•The legal basis was not provided in the source

Who Was Involved in the Dispute

The “Progressive List for Peace” presented itself as a joint Jewish-Arab political force: it included 60 Jewish candidates and 60 Arab candidates. The list was headed by attorney Mohammed Miari, who had previously been a member of the “Al-Ard” group, and Israel Defense Forces reserve major general Matti Peled.

The Disqualification and the High Court of Justice’s Ruling

The Central Elections Committee decided not to allow the list to participate in the 1984 elections. Following a petition to the High Court of Justice, the party was allowed to participate in the vote. The materials presented did not specify the case number, the date of the judgment, the statutory provisions applied, or the court’s reasoning.

What Happened Later

At first, the list demonstrated political cooperation between Jews and Arabs and linked its platform to the hope for peace. The partnership later dissolved; the source provided links the crisis to the war and Saddam Hussein, but does not include a detailed description of these events.

What this means for you

This affair shows that a Central Elections Committee decision to disqualify a list from participating in elections may be subject to review by the High Court of Justice and overturned by the court. However, the materials provided do not make it possible to determine the precise legal standards for such intervention or to apply them to other cases.

Find a lawyer for this topic

Case analysis based on court rulings