U.S. Court Allows Starbucks Workers’ Union Lawsuit to Proceed
A federal court in Pennsylvania denied Starbucks’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the workers’ union Workers United. This is an interim ruling: the court has not yet decided whether the name Starbucks Workers United and its logo infringe the company’s trademark rights.
Key facts
- •Court: The federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
- •Ruling publication date: October 2, 2026
- •The lawsuit was filed in April 2026
- •Plaintiff: Workers United
- •Defendant: Starbucks
- •Claimed union size: more than 12,000 employees at nearly 700 locations
What the Parties Dispute
Workers United represents thousands of employees at the chain and seeks confirmation of its right to use the name Starbucks Workers United. The union also seeks to retain the logo featuring the chain’s name and a circular symbol with a raised fist. Starbucks believes that this design infringes its trademark rights, while the union argues that it merely identifies the company’s employees whom it represents and does not create confusion between its activities and those of the chain.
What the Court Decided
The federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied Starbucks’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the union in April. As a result, the proceedings will continue. The ruling does not determine who owns the disputed rights or whether use of the name and logo constitutes infringement; the source does not include the detailed legal reasoning for denying the motion.
Background to the Labor Dispute
The nationwide campaign to unionize Starbucks employees began in late 2021, following a vote by employees at a location in Buffalo, New York. According to Starbucks Workers United, the union represents more than 12,000 employees at nearly 700 locations in the United States. A first collective bargaining agreement between the company and its unionized employees has not yet been signed.
Implications for Israel
The ruling was issued by a U.S. court and, in itself, does not change Israeli labor law or trademark rules. It shows that a dispute between an employer and a workers’ union regarding the use of the company’s name and similar symbols can be adjudicated separately from the labor dispute itself.
What this means for you
For workers and workers’ unions in Israel, this ruling does not create new rights and does not serve as binding precedent. In a similar dispute, the legality of the name or logo would be examined under Israeli law and in accordance with the specific circumstances, including the likelihood of confusion with the employer’s brand.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Трудовое право
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион