Freelancer Paid Against Invoices or Employee: How to Claim Vacation Pay, Pension Contributions and Severance Pay
Invoices, an open file with the tax authorities and an agreement titled “Independent Contractor” still do not determine a person’s true status. Israel’s labor courts examine the relationship in practice and then calculate the payments separately—with the amount shown on the invoices not always becoming the determining salary.
- •The actor worked with one theater for more than 15 years
- •More than 30 years of engagement did not guarantee recognition as an employee
- •The metalwork contractor employed up to 5 employees of his own
- •₪2.7 million was the amount of the original claim that was dismissed
- •₪20,000 in legal costs was awarded in favor of the company
- •7 judges and 2 public representatives heard the “Kuta” case
An Invoice Does Not Rule Out an Employment Relationship
Employee status is a legal question, not the title of the agreement. Even if a person agreed to work as an independent contractor, registered with the tax authorities and regularly issued invoices or receipts, the court may retroactively recognize an employment relationship. At the first stage, the burden of proof rests with the service provider. The court examines the relationship as a whole rather than a single characteristic, such as monthly payment or an entry card to a factory.
What Exactly the Court Examines
The main criterion is the integration test: whether the person was part of the organization’s regular operations and whether the person had an independent business of their own. The court also examines subordination to instructions and supervision, ownership of work tools and equipment, personal performance of the work, the regularity of the engagement, the ability to send a substitute, the existence of other clients and business risk. Instructions concerning the desired result still do not prove subordination: a customer may explain to a contractor what project it needs. A fixed work schedule, the need to obtain approval for an absence, work using the customer’s equipment and the absence of any genuine risk of profit or loss constitute much more persuasive evidence.
The Actor and the Welder: Why Duration Does Not Determine Everything
The Tel Aviv Regional Labor Court recognized as an employee an actor who performed for more than 15 years almost exclusively at one theater and received monthly payment as an independent contractor. He was integrated into the theater’s operations, was subject to its instructions and provided only his labor, while the theater purchased the equipment; the court found no independent business or business risk. In another case, the Be’er Sheva Regional Labor Court dismissed the claim of a metalwork specialist, even though the engagement lasted more than 30 years and services were provided daily. The contractor had employees of his own—up to five people during certain periods—another business, his own work tools, the ability to send a substitute and freedom in organizing the work.
Which Payments May Be Included in the Calculation
After status is recognized, the person may claim financial rights to which a salaried employee would have been entitled during the relevant period and according to the specific circumstances. The calculation may include vacation pay or payment in lieu of unused vacation, employer pension contributions, convalescence pay and severance pay; the latter depends on how the relationship ended and whether entitlement arose. The National Labor Court’s judgment in the “Kuta” case also allows non-pecuniary compensation, taking into account the circumstances of the case and the deterrent effect. However, recognizing a person as an employee does not mean that every component claimed will be awarded automatically.
Why the Amount on the Invoices Is Not Always the Salary
At the second stage, the alternative salary of a salaried employee is determined—how much employees in a comparable position in the same organization would ordinarily have been paid, together with the social benefits derived from that salary. The burden of proving the alternative salary rests with the employer. The court may then offset the overpayment received under the contractor arrangement against the employment payments due; any remaining balance is not repaid to the employer. If the employer knew in advance that an employment relationship existed in practice but engaged the person as an independent contractor, the rights are calculated based on the contractor consideration paid to that person.
FAQ
If I issued invoices, can I still be considered an employee?
Yes. An invoice, registration with the tax authorities and an agreement containing the wording “Independent Contractor” are taken into account, but do not determine status by themselves. The court examines actual integration, supervision, the personal nature of the work, work tools, clients and business risk.
Is working for only one customer sufficient?
No, but almost complete dependence on a single source of work may support the claim. The court will compare this with other circumstances: whether there was an independent business, whether assistants could be employed, whether a substitute could be sent and whether commercial decisions could be made independently.
Can pension contributions, vacation pay and convalescence pay be claimed for previous years?
These components may be included in the calculation after an employment relationship is recognized. Their existence and amount depend on the period, the alternative salary and the circumstances of the work, so simply multiplying the invoice amount by the customary rate is insufficient.
Can the customer demand repayment of the overpayment for the years of work?
The employer may request that the difference between the contractor consideration and the cost of employment be offset when calculating the rights awarded. However, if the calculation shows that the independent contractor was paid a higher amount, the employee is not required to repay the excess balance to the employer.
Will an attendance report help prove an employment relationship?
Not necessarily. In the case of the metalwork specialist, the entry and exit records were used to calculate hourly payment and did not by themselves prove integration into the workforce. The purpose of the records and whether the person was subject to the employees’ work schedule are important.
What to do next
Collect agreements, invoices and receipts, correspondence containing instructions, schedules, data concerning entry cards, equipment, other clients and the ability to send a substitute. Then prepare a timeline of the work and a separate list of the components that were not paid, without automatically treating the full amount on the invoices as salary. Assessing the prospects of the proceeding requires comparing these facts with the labor courts’ tests and the offset rules.
Sources
- National Labor Court Judgment in the “Kuta” Case
- Determining the Existence of an Employee–Employer Relationship
- Retroactive Recognition of a Theater Actor as an Employee
- Offsetting Contractor Consideration upon Recognition as an Employee
- Judgment Dismissing the Contractor’s Claim after More Than 30 Years of Engagement
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Трудовое право
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион
Read also
- Work Conditions Worsened: Can You Quit and Still Get Severance?7 min read
- Your Employer Erased Vacation Days: Can You Get the Days or Money Back?6 min read
- Your Payslip Shows “Global Overtime”: Are Your Actual Hours Still Underpaid?7 min read
- Fired Without a Real Hearing: Reinstatement or Compensation?6 min read