Elections: Party Positions on Sovereignty, Evacuation, and Outposts in Judea and Samaria
The “ynet News” website compared the parties’ positions ahead of the elections on issues concerning Judea and Samaria: the application of Israeli sovereignty, the possible evacuation of settlements, and the future of illegal outposts. These are political platforms and statements, not an enacted law or a court ruling.
Key facts
- •The article concerns the 2026 elections.
- •Judea and Samaria and Area C are examined.
- •Likud declined to participate in the survey.
- •The approval of 3,401 housing units in the E1 area is mentioned.
- •104 new settlements and 160 agricultural farms were reported.
- •The article does not concern a law or a court ruling.
Sovereignty and a Palestinian State
Yisrael Beiteinu supports applying Israeli sovereignty to Area C, while Otzma Yehudit, the Religious Zionism–Zehut bloc, and Ama Yisrael support sovereignty over all of Judea and Samaria. Beyachad supports Naftali Bennett’s 2012 plan regarding Area C, subject to considerations of timing. Ra’am supports a two-state arrangement, while the Joint List demands an end to the occupation and the evacuation of the settlements. Yashar! opposes steps that could lead to a binational state and does not believe that establishing a Palestinian state is currently on the agenda.
Evacuation of Settlements
Yashar!, Beyachad, Otzma Yehudit, Ama Yisrael, and the Reservists and Economic Party categorically reject the evacuation of settlements, either entirely or with respect to sites established legally or with the approval of the state and the Israel Defense Forces. Blue and White argues that its framework, which resembles the Trump plan, makes it possible to avoid evacuation through infrastructure that ensures security and freedom of movement. The Democrats call for striving toward territorial separation as part of a regional process with the United States and the moderate Arab states, but the source does not specify exactly which settlements are to be evacuated under this framework.
Illegal Outposts and Construction
The approaches range from full legalization to evacuation. Otzma Yehudit and the Religious Zionism–Zehut bloc pledge to regularize the status of the outposts; Yashar! proposes examining each case on its merits, while Beyachad proposes legalizing sites on land that has been used lawfully and demolishing structures on private land. Yisrael Beiteinu, the Democrats, and Blue and White emphasize legality and law enforcement, while the Joint List demands the evacuation of all outposts and the prosecution of those involved in their establishment, operation, and financing.
Other Parties
Likud declined to respond, stating that it does not participate in questionnaires. Within United Torah Judaism, there are disagreements between the Hasidic and Lithuanian components, and there is no unified central platform regarding Judea and Samaria. Shas opposes a Palestinian state and has supported initiatives by right-wing parties, but the source does not present a separate, systematic platform on its behalf. On the issue of Palestinian construction in Area C, most right-wing parties demand increased oversight and the demolition of illegal structures, while Ra’am opposes restrictions on the development of the Palestinian population.
What this means for you
At this stage, these statements in themselves do not change the legal status of housing, land, settlements, or outposts. Practical implications for residents may arise only after the elections, if the parties’ positions are implemented through legislation, government decisions, construction plans, enforcement measures, or a diplomatic agreement. The source does not report that any such binding decisions were adopted in connection with this article.
Find a lawyer for this topic
- Lawyers: Недвижимость
- Lawyers in Тель-Авив
- Lawyers in Иерусалим
- Lawyers in Хайфа
- Lawyers in Ришон ле-Цион